What is Happening to Higher Education?

— Jane Applegate Belzer

college prof. TN

Just about every week I read articles in the contemporary press about some campus that is experiencing stress. Recently it was reported that Cornell University had reached a settlement with the Federal Government to pay $300 million dollars in exchange for returning to this university millions in research grants that had been halted by the Federal administration. Another surprise was a letter sent to every post-secondary institution in the country from the Secretary of Education asking that by the end of 2026 universities state commitments to seven areas including free speech, foreign influence, artificial intelligence and academic rigor, and such statements must be posted on their respective websites. Here in Florida, New College was newsworthy because an audit revealed that they spend five times per student than the University of Florida for much lower results. And, to complicate matters in Sarasota even more, the state legislature has transferred the USF Sarasota Campus to New College! Why is higher education in the spotlight? What is the source of these conflicts? Have we ever experienced such intrusion in the academic world by the government before?

As background, higher education in this country began in the 1600’s with small, religious colleges like Harvard that prepared men for the ministry and for civic leadership. In the 19th century, westward expansion, women’s colleges and historically Black colleges broadened access and included more secular studies. The Morrill Act created land grant universities which focused on agriculture and engineering. By the late 1800’s the German model of the research university introduced graduate study. The mid-20th century brought mass enrollment through the G.I. Bill. Campuses large and small, public and private, flourished. Today there are approximately 5,900 postsecondary institutions that are eligible for federal funding. Of those, about 4,000 are degree-granting colleges and universities. About 20 million students are currently enrolled in some form of postsecondary education.

I have had nearly seventy years of experience in American public education as a student, a teacher, a graduate student, a policy analyst, a professor and a university administrator. I have been affiliated with five large public universities in three different states. My parents, both educators, stressed the importance of becoming well- educated. Education to them meant developing basic skills and being able to think for oneself. It meant being able to find one’s place as a contributing member of society. It meant exploring different points of view, and different cultural stances. To be well educated was an essential value. And higher education has given me all of that and more.

Have we ever experienced such intrusion in the academic world by the government before?

Government and political intrusion in higher education has occurred during my lifetime in different ways. In the 1950’s we experienced the McCarthy Era where universities were targeted as a place for communism to flourish. As a result, conformity was demanded. Faculty and students faced top-down repression by the state. To dissent was dangerous. In Florida we had The Johns Committee from 1956-1965 to investigate communism and target homosexuals using intimidation, interrogations and public shaming. The 1960’s and 1970’s brought campus unrest over the Vietnam War. Campuses like The Ohio State University were literally on fire, and students at Kent State were shot by National Guard troops. Students spoke out and fought back. Those were my undergraduate experiences. The 1980’s brought more Federal money to higher education and more standards and controls. As a young professor I was beginning to feel the pressure to conform to state mandates. A major focus on accreditation at state and federal levels required much documentation and accountability. Were students getting what they needed to enter the workforce and be successful? No longer were questions focusing on the basics of a Liberal Arts curriculum. Now education was being tied to future income. What were university students doing to contribute to the national economy?

As my career advanced through the ranks of the professoriate, I was called upon to do more to illustrate the relevance of an advanced education. When I became a university administrator I quickly learned that public accountability mattered and the numbers mattered even more. How many students a college had was somewhat reflected in budget allocations. It mattered how many students graduated and how long it took students to finish degrees once they started. It mattered how many full-time and part-time faculty were employed and how many students were working on advanced degrees. It also mattered how many graduates found employment and where. It REALLY mattered how many grants and contracts were awarded and how much external money was earned. The statistical metrics went on and on and not only dictated budget but also buffered the status of the institution. Issues of quality were rarely considered until time for an accreditation review. It was metrics that mattered—and still do. It was income that mattered. It was expenditures that mattered. Even our own OLLI is caught up in that mindset.  And it is the political influence mentioned earlier that shapes the questions asked and data produced.

It was metrics that mattered—and still do.

I must confess that this short essay has been challenging to write. So much of what I valued in my own educational life seems to have disappeared. Where are today’s college students encouraged to think critically? To ask questions? To voice opinions grounded in relevant literature? Today’s campus experience is so much different than it was in the 1960’s. The pressures are different and the questions about what matters most are different. Higher education in our country and in our community is once again experiencing conflict and stress as daily confrontations ranging from admissions standards to research funding to academic freedom and free speech are called up for scrutiny. The values embedded in higher learning have largely been set aside as universities grapple with requests and mandates coming from state and federal governments. No longer are we concerned about Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI). In fact, now syllabi for courses are electronically screened to assure that words like those no longer appear in course materials. And changes in technology and A.I. will be guiding much of what is to be learned. I cannot predict what will happen. I only know that I am very glad to have been educated when higher education mattered.

I bet you are, too.

College grad wage drop

Higher Education at a Crossroads

As campuses fill up, the traditional four-year degree is facing a profound identity crisis. Beyond the looming weight of tuition debt and campus closures, universities are grappling with a chill on international talent, the disruption of AI on student workflows, and a shifting job market. Are colleges evolving fast enough to survive this new calculus?

Read the full Axios newsletter to explore how students, schools, and trade programs are navigating these changes.


Jane Applegate Belzer, retired professor and Dean of USF’s College of Education, joined OLLI in 2012. She has taken OLLI classes in literature, art, history, lifestyles, nature and technology. Jane is a member of the Food Glorious Food and Talking Movies SIGs. In the past she teamed up with Ara Rogers to teach A Course is Born: From Concept to Classroom, an OLLI course for prospective instructors

6 responses to “What is Happening to Higher Education?”
  1. Judy Patterson

    Thank you, Jane, for detailing Trump’s Government’s dismantling our higher education. I watched with horror the Government’s overhaul of New College, replacing traditional academic governance with a conservative board that eliminated diversity and altered core curricula. At the federal level, this approach is a direct assault on institutional independence through withdrawing funding from universities that maintain Diversity, Equity, and (DEI) programs. I appreciate your thoughtful article and support of academic integrity and safety. Education institutions are deeply vulnerable and diminished. Please cast your votes to defeat these politicians.

    1. J. Applegate

      Thank you, Judy, for your thoughtful comments. You move us to action when action counts more than ever.

  2. Frida Guzman

    Dear Jane, your article touches me deeply!

    I understand your sense of loss when you write, “I am very glad to have been educated when higher education mattered.” I believe today’s universities face a difficult responsibility: science and technology education should give students the hope of practical results- the knowledge and skills that will allow them to support themselves and build a secure future. That practical purpose matters.

    But education should also nourish something deeper. Students should have the hope that the work they choose will be something they can enjoy, value, and perhaps even love, in the same way that an artist finds meaning in practicing an art.

    If graduation rates, salaries, research funding, and other metrics become the only measures of success, higher education risks creating an imbalance between two sides of the same coin: survival and the soul. Students need preparation for economic reality, but they also need an education that helps them discover what interests them, what fills their souls, what gives their work meaning, and how they want to contribute to society.

    Perhaps the challenge for higher education today is not to choose between these two purposes, but to find a better balance between them.

    1. J. Applegate

      How well you expressed the duality that existed. I’m afraid the scales have tipped so far that the soul of a well educated citizenry has all but disappeared. But if history tells us anything, those scales can be rebalanced. It is to be hoped.

  3. Bharat Y Pathakjee

    The idea that every High School Grad should get college Education is a product of the GI bill, more complicated industrialization and Civil rights. Perhaps the two pillars of learning for the pleasure of finding out versus earning a living are more difficult to balance than we thought. Perhaps testosterone, biology and, yes, the dreaded words innate ability do play a bigger role than we appreciate or are willing to admit. The old Harold Lloyd movie “The Freshman” comes to mind.

  4. Kevin Chittim

    Jane,
    What a wonderful, thoughtful and, unfortunately, accurate article from one of the many education leaders in our cohort. Absolutely correct that to be educated is an essential value that must be protected on these difficult times.

    Your brief comment about our OLLI hit home with me. We’ve descended into a mode where OLLI’s mission now largely ignores creation of joy, companionship and peer education in favor of financial metrics (BTW often inaccurate) overseen by non-educators. Sad state of things, but we can do better.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Verified by MonsterInsights