1976/2026

by Joan Weaving

Remembering a stable 1976—and reflecting on the decade that fractured our democracy.

Op Sail 1976 NYC
Operation Sail, 1976 Bicentennial Celebration, New York City.

The temperature was in the low 80’s and the sky was sunny on that July 4th when we gathered on the roof to view the bicentennial celebrations in NYC. I was living on the west side of the Hudson near the George Washington Bridge and we could see the tall ships as they paraded up the river and back down. The masts of each ship looked like they would skim the bottom of the bridge and we held our collective breath as they turned. The sails were all unfurled, and each crew stood in dress uniform on the rails, saluting America. If we stood on tippy toes and looked south, we could see the flotilla of small boats swarming around the Statue of Liberty, the beautiful lady of the harbor who welcomed immigrants to our shores. In the distance the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center penetrated the sky. Only a few years old, they had quickly become the symbol of America’s great strength and dominance. How ironic that a quarter of a century later their destruction would symbolize the beginning of America’s decline.

But on that roof top and around the country, we were thrilled. Thrilled to be Americans with a rich heritage to celebrate; thrilled to be living in the best country in the world; thrilled to believe that our future was bright.

It’s hard to remember now, thirty years after its decline, that we were constantly living with the Cold War and the threat of Communism. The need to outdo the Soviets was paramount. Only seven years before we had beaten Russia to the moon, symbolizing to the world that democracy was superior to autocracy. Our celebration of freedom that July day was a show of pride in our way of life.

Positive changes were occurring in the 1970’s. The Women’s Liberation movement was growing, and women were beginning to demand their rightful place in the halls of power. Gloria Steinem launched Ms. Magazine to help women manage the double responsibilities of homemaking and working outside the home. Reproductive freedom reached its pinnacle when Roe vs Wade allowed women to choose to terminate a pregnancy if necessary. The EEOC, which was established by Congress in the 60s, made discrimination in the workplace illegal. Companies had to change their hiring and firing practices to assure that women and people of color were being treated fairly. Inclusion was the watch word.

All was not bright, however. The Vietnam war finally ended in 1975, but the damage it had done to our country was still evident. The war had carved a deep gash between the younger and older generations, each side feeling that the other was unpatriotic. I had marched against the war, believing what would later prove true—that it was immoral and unwinnable. I marched and protested and chanted, and didn’t stop to consider that the right to do so could be vulnerable. America had granted me that right.

But it was Watergate which dominated the 1970’s and for most of us it was our first exposure to impeachable acts. Nixon, a victim of his own hubris, had taped his oval office conversations, including his planning and then covering up the break in at Democratic National Headquarters in the Watergate building.

Looking back, I can see how the scandal of Watergate was different from the scandals of today. Though we didn’t recognize it at the time, Watergate reaffirmed that our constitution, with its protected freedoms and system of checks and balances, still worked.

Watergate unfolded in the press due to the persistence of two young reporters, Woodward and Bernstein, who worked for the Washington Post, and the daring gamble the newspaper took to expose the crimes that had been committed and were taking place by our leaders. It was these two reporters who uncovered the smoking gun that led to Nixon’s resignation. The press was not silenced, though it may have been threatened or even sued. And the Post not only continued, but it thrived, becoming the only viable competitor to the New York Times.

Nixon did try to get away with his crimes just as Trump does today. And he did try to smear his enemies, just as Trump does today. But in Nixon’s case, the constitutional system pushed back. And there’s the difference.

The Senate convened a Watergate Committee. Under the leadership of Democrat Sam Ervin and Republican Howard Baker, the committee gathered the evidence that eventually led to the resignation of 40 of Nixon’s aides.

The committee appointed a special prosecutor, Archibald Cox. Nixon ordered Attorney General Elliot Richardson to fire Cox. Richardson refused on principle and resigned. Nixon then ordered next in line, William Ruckelshaus, to fire Cox. He too refused and resigned. Eventually Nixon found Robert Bork to carry out his order. Years later Bork was refused a Supreme Court appointment partly because he complied with this illegal order.

A new prosecutor, Leon Jaworski, upon learning of the existence of white house tapes, ordered them to be turned over to the Senate Committee. The White House released edited transcripts of the tapes; the Judiciary Committee of the House insisted on receiving the actual tapes.

Nixon refused and took his case to the Supreme Court which voted unanimously that the tapes must be turned over.

Impeachment proceedings began in the Senate. Key Republicans joined the Democrats and warned Nixon that he would be impeached. Nixon chose to resign.

In a smooth transition of power, Vice President Gerald Ford was sworn in as president.

His first order was to pardon Richard Nixon so that Watergate could be put behind and the country could move forward. He knew it could cost him the presidency if he chose to run for office in 1976, but he did it because he believed it was right. And he did lose in the ’76 election.

Notice the pattern here:

  • The press proceeded to do its job.
  • The Senate proceeded to do its job.
  • The Supreme Court proceeded to do its job.
  • The new president proceeded to do his job.
  • The system held. The system worked.
  • Our constitution was secure.

Can we say the same today?

As I write this article, the 250th birthday of our country is three months away. At this time in 1976, every street corner, every mall, every shop announced in bright red, white and blue banners that a special day was coming. Stores displayed red, white and blue merchandise. TV channels announced special programming on American history. It was a big deal. America was a big deal.

As of this writing, I have not seen any announcements. There are no banners, no fancy merchandise, no parades planned.

What has happened?

One could argue that halfway through a century is not as important as the full century mark.

But I think it is much more than that.

America is under a cloud. We have realized that our constitution is vulnerable and that our rights are not as safely protected as we believed.

We have seen the first ever non-peaceful transfer of power, with a president unwilling to concede and allowing rioters to storm the US Capitol.

We have seen infringements on freedom of the press as the press corps is denied access to unfiltered information and major broadcasters and newspapers are threatened if they are not favorable to the president.

We have seen the legislative branch become paralyzed by fear of opposing the president allowing him to enrich the oligarchs, reduce access to health care for the poor, limit inclusion of minority groups in businesses and start a war of questionable value.

We have seen the Supreme Court become a puppet of the president by granting him unlimited powers (our entire constitution is based on no one person having unlimited powers. The whole point was to have no kings).

We have seen immigrants being grabbed from their homes and workplaces by a gestapo of masked men and being denied the rights that the constitution assures to all people.

We have seen the DOJ protecting the president (already a convicted sex offender) by sitting on the files which could show his guilt in an underage prostitution scandal.

NO, we are not celebrating.

America has lost its way.

We the people have lost our confidence that the way of life we cherish and celebrated fifty years ago will still prevail.

We are at a fork in the road. Let’s hope we choose the right one.


Joan Weaving embarked on a successful business career as the first woman Product Manager for Nabisco, Inc., and a Corporate Vice President for Equitable, before starting her own consulting company in 1988, specializing in leadership development and executive coaching for major corporations. Joan has been an active OLLI participant and has played a key role in the conceptualization and execution of the annual Board of Advisor’s retreat. Joan has led our Exploring Leadership Opportunities class.

12 responses to “1976/2026”
  1. Anne Strozier

    Wonderful and such a well-written article, Joan. Devastating in its mesage, but accurate I believe. Thank you for writing it.

  2. Arlene Zimney

    Great article, Joan! You write with such clarity and conviction. I watched on TV, and felt as you did.

  3. Beryl Byles

    Thanks, Joan, for your descriptive and important walk down memory lane! As the song says, “I remember it well”!
    Hopefully, our “better angels” are working behind the scenes and against the greedy vengefulness that characterizes our current state of government.

  4. J. Marie Dolphin

    Well said, Joan! Thank you for your honest appraisal of the times we live in and for refusing to tiptoe around the truth.

  5. Patricia Schatz

    You are article reflects many of my own thoughts, which I have expressed privately to friends. I did not celebrate the country’s 250th anniversary. I am ashamed of our government and ashamed of many of our citizens who supported the whims of an egotistical bully who is now our president.

    I regret that many of the personal freedoms like freedom of speech are being eroded. Freedom of the press is clearly in danger.

    Thank you for a well written summary of the contrast of these two anniversary celebrations

  6. Diane Russell

    Joan, your description of the Tall Ships event on July 4, 1976 is superb. I watched them enter New York Harbor from the top of the World Trade Center. Little did I know that the World Trade Center would be reduced to rubble 25 years later, or that our democracy’s very existence would be threatened as it has been over the past 10 years. Your review of the past 50 years is perfectly written. Thank you!

  7. Margaret Zabor

    Excellent essay. I agree with you that our country is under a cloud and has lost its way. All I can say is: keep the faith!

  8. Linda Rounsaville

    Joan,
    Thank you for recapturing the events, names and emotions our generation experienced. It is a beautiful article. Sadly, those who should read it will not.

  9. Elissa

    Joan, thank you this review of the past fifty years and the contrast between then and now. How easy to forget and dismiss the past– though the memories of those of us who witnessed those years keep resurfacing and asking the question: how did we get to this? Not sure of the answer but one thing is clear we must tell our succeeding generations what happened to the great American experiment.

  10. Sharon Feldman

    My friend Joan, always the distiller of information, meaningful events, and feelings. We have brought much of the woes upon ourselves by not paying attention. We must stay vigilant. Thank you.

  11. Linda Dunk

    Joan, thank you for your carefully crafted essay, a reminder of our young country’s past and current challenges. You demonstrate that our right and duty to speak truth to power is at the foundation of our democracy. I have been shocked to fully realize that our democracy is not an end point but a forever work in progress. May we hold on to hope and live up to the challenge.

  12. Mary Churchill

    Joan, ditto on all the comments. I wonder now, What will history say about these times?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Verified by MonsterInsights